Does anyone remember Jimmy Saville heading the seatbelt campaign back in the mid-1970's? Clunk Click Every Trip!
The current British law regarding seatbelts in motor vehicles is thus:
4.2 Since 1965, new cars in the UK have had to be fitted with front seat belts by law. Rear seat belts were required to be fitted to new cars from 1987. On 31 January 1983, it became compulsory for drivers and front seat passengers to wear seat belts. Wearing rear seat belts became compulsory for children under 14 in 1989 and for adults in 1991. An exemption for goods vehicle drivers undertaking deliveries was curtailed in 2005. In 2006, new rules required children to travel in the appropriate child restraint. At the same time, passengers aged 14 and above on buses and coaches were required to use seat belts where available.(source: http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/closed/compliance/compliancehtml?page=16 )
So, how come, every time I open a British newspaper (or view online news reports) or watch ("fly on the wall") programmes like "What Katie Did Next", do I see "celebrities" being allowed to drive without their seatbelt? What denotes that they are above the law and what is stopping the police from actually prosecuting them? Surely there isn't a loophole in the law of the land that allows them to get away with it?
The latest culprits are Ashley and Cheryl Cole. Here they are pictured driving away from a casino without wearing their seatbelts. Fair enough, they may still be in the car park, but it has been proved that even at slow speeds, the sudden jolt of having to slam your brakes on for anything (a stray member of the paparazzi? a fan running over for an autograph?) can have drastic effects.
My point is this... Safety first!!! Secondly, public figures, who are very influential to our children (X-Factor judge and Premiership footballer in this instance) should be setting an example AT ALL TIMES and should follow the letter of the law. No excuses.
Edited to add:
Some facts for you...
- In a crash someone not wearing a seat belt is more likely to die than someone using one. In 2007, of the 1,432 car occupants killed, research indicates that some 34 per cent were not wearing a seat belt.
- While few people admit to regularly travelling without a seat belt, research shows that 24 per cent of people admit they sometimes don't wear a seat belt when travelling in the back, and 10 per cent in the front. There is also evidence that people are less likely to use seat belts on short or familiar journeys or at low speeds. This puts them at serious risk of injury in a crash.
- You are twice as likely to die in a crash if you don't wear a seat belt.
- Nearly 300 lives would almost certainly have been saved in 2007 if all car occupants had been wearing a belt. Roughly, that's one life a day.
THINK! seat belt strategy
The Department for Transport has been promoting the use of seat belts since 1973, long before it became compulsory by law to use one. THINK! are continuing to work on reinforcing the message to new generations of drivers and passengers through a mixture of powerful TV and radio advertising, supported by our online seat belt crash simulator. This shows the real effects of not using a seat belt at different speeds.




